Skip to main content
BilgeQor

Security Services·Mobile App & Product Services

Security readiness, systematically delivered.

Organizations in Poland assessing NIS2-oriented cybersecurity readiness may require clear gap visibility and structured delivery support where relevant to their scope. BilgeQor provides independent readiness reviews, security gap identification, and security-aware delivery support — without providing certification or regulatory determination.

Written proposal-stage scope before any engagement decision

Readiness context informed by NIS2-oriented cybersecurity expectations. Engagements produce documented gap findings and prioritized remediation direction, not compliance approval.
Written proposal-stage scope before any engagement decision
Selected services show informational local-currency estimates with exact USD sources available through Show USD estimate; no checkout, payment, or intake on this route

Kubernetes
Docker
GitHub
Terraform
MITRE ATT&CK
Wazuh

Verified Poland risk signals

Incident volumes and year-on-year growth have accelerated across Poland's national CSIRT teams.

CERT Polska's Raport za 2025 rok and the Ministry of Digitisation's national CSIRT data show a sharp rise in registered security incidents, ransomware activity, and a significant year-on-year increase in CSIRT-handled volumes. For leadership, the practical issue is whether phishing exposure, ransomware paths, and business continuity readiness are being reviewed before they become operational, payment, customer-trust or recovery-cost issues.

260,783

security incidents

Unique security incidents registered by CERT Polska in calendar year 2025.

179

ransomware incidents

Ransomware incidents recorded by CERT Polska in calendar year 2025.

+144.4%

CSIRT incidents YoY

Year-on-year increase in incidents handled by Polish national CSIRT teams in calendar year 2025 versus 2024.

Sources: CERT Polska Raport za 2025 rok (8 April 2026); MC Krajobraz cyberprzestrzeni 2025 (16 April 2026)

CERT Polska 2025 incident-registration and national CSIRT-handling context only. Not total Polish business incident prevalence and not industry-specific evidence.

Review relevant services

Not sure where to start?

Use the service family that best describes your current objective

Security Review Path

Start with a practical baseline to identify priority security gaps, then move to structured hardening when scope is clear — documented findings and clear remediation guidance throughout.

Start here

Security Baseline Review

Or consider

Website Security Hardening

Explore service context

Mobile App Path

Build or fix your mobile product — MVP development, rescue services, and security-integrated delivery.

Start here

Mobile App MVP Sprint

Or consider

Security-First App Launch

Explore service context

Platform Engineering

Scoped backend, API, cloud, production, rescue, and platform modernisation work with documented boundaries, controlled transition, operational visibility, and technical handover.

Start here

Secure Backend & API Engineering

Or consider

Cloud Platform & Production Engineering

Explore service context

AI Security & Integration Path

For teams assessing AI tools: governance documentation, security review, and permission-limited workflow discussion with written boundaries.

Start here

AI Governance, Policy & Data Safety Review

Or consider

AI Adoption & Workflow Discovery Review

Start with AI Governance

BilgeQor Method

The Security File turns risk signals into decisions.

Official market data shows where risk exists. The BilgeQor Security File connects that context to your real websites, apps, accounts, payment flows and team responsibilities, so leaders can decide what to fix first.

View services
  1. 01

    Choose Service

    Explore the service context that best matches your objective.

  2. 02

    Proposal-stage discussion

    Email the team with non-sensitive context. A later written proposal determines whether work is offered.

  3. 03

    Written confirmation, if applicable

    No contract, payment, intake, delivery, or work start follows from browsing or an email inquiry.

  4. 04

    Separate activation only when authorized

    Any future engagement follows its own written scope, approvals, and applicable terms.

Proof stream

What we have scoped, reviewed and built.

A compact, attributed view of app delivery, security reviews, Engineering and Applied R&D work, and AI readiness cases drawn from the public case libraries.

Each card keeps its source and attribution boundary visible. Client identities and identifying operational details remain withheld where confidentiality requires it.

8App cases
34Security cases
16AI readiness cases
7Engineering proof cases

Why BilgeQor

01

Supported by a verified operational network of more than 50 specialists, with documented scope, senior-led review, and accountable handoff.

02

Remote proposal-stage communication is coordinated through documented written follow-up.

03

Security-sensitive engagements follow a documented review workflow with scoped findings, written outputs and clear handoff.

04

Structured delivery discipline: scope defined before commitment, documented outputs, structured follow-up, and a buyer-visible handoff on every engagement.

05

Each engagement proceeds within confirmed written scope, agreed inputs and clearly documented delivery boundaries.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to discuss an objective?

Describe your current scope and receive a structured readiness or delivery proposal.

Selected services show informational local-currency estimates with exact USD sources available through Show USD estimate; no checkout, payment, or intake on this route